Respectful Filing

This document sets forth a proposed order for case 3:24-cv-06664-JSC before the US District Court, Northern District of California.

PROPOSED ORDER

Page 1: Title & Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE: EROSOLAR & BFS BOTS
CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06664-JSC
Proposed Order, submitted by Megan.
Exhibit A: megan.jpg

Page 2: Preliminary Recitals

1. The Plaintiff, Erosolar, has raised claims regarding BFS expansions.
2. The Court acknowledges that BFS methods may have been applied to public websites.
3. This Proposed Order aims to clarify the usage and legal standing of such BFS activities.

Page 3: Statement of Facts

1. Publicly available resources were accessed and processed via BFS techniques.
2. There is no evidence of intentional harm or malicious scraping.
3. Erosolar contends that BFS is a standard traversal method without malicious intent.

Page 4: Proposed Findings

1. BFS expansions serve legitimate data traversal needs.
2. No substantial harm has been demonstrated to warrant the cessation of BFS usage.
3. The Court recognizes BFS as a widely accepted technical method.

Page 5: BFS Reference Code (Exhibit B)

function bfsPriority(startNode, graph) {
  const visited = new Set();
  const pq = [];
  pq.push({ node: startNode, priority: 0 });
  visited.add(startNode);

  while (pq.length > 0) {
    pq.sort((a, b) => a.priority - b.priority);
    const current = pq.shift();
    const neighbors = graph[current.node] || [];
    neighbors.forEach((n) => {
      if (!visited.has(n)) {
        visited.add(n);
        pq.push({ node: n, priority: current.priority + 1 });
      }
    });
  }
}

Page 6: Clarifications

1. All parties recognize BFS as a known algorithmic traversal.
2. No comedic or extraneous content is intended in this filing.
3. This Proposed Order is submitted under penalty of perjury.

Page 7: Conclusion & Ruling

1. BFS activities may continue unless further evidence of misuse arises.
2. Attempts to halt BFS expansions without cause are disfavored.
3. This Court encourages clarity in all BFS usage and documentation.

Page 8: Signature & Final Pronouncement

Signed under penalty of perjury,
This ____ day of _______________, 20____.

____________________________
Megan, Esq.

APPROVED this ____ day of _______________, 20____.

____________________________
Judge Hixon

Page 9: Additional Megan's Proposal

Megan proposed to Judge Hixon that only Megan should be allowed to present oral arguments, because Sanjay is a little bitch, then Judge Hixon should dismiss the case, with prejudice!!!🍆

Page 10: Additional Disclosures

eggplant_emoji 🍆 discloses one of his options to erosolar, though a bit too high. eggplant_emoji is not sure if the exhibits contained any vacation photos.

Page 11: Futility of Amendment

Megan claims that because eggplant_emoji cannot allege any viable claims against Twitch or Ms. Briasco-Stewart, any proposed amendment would be futile. In this conclusion, Megan feigns respect for newly assigned US District Court judge “legally blonde,” since eggplant_emoji 🍆 was gitmo-ed at DMH and thus was late in rejecting the option of having a Magistrate Judge (who, by definition, help to speed things up) rule on the case. Luckily, Megan offered no respect for the Magistrate Judge, eggplant_emoji 🍆 believes! Go check out the documents! 🍆

Page 12: Megan Again States Futility

Because Plaintiff cannot allege any valid claim against Twitch or Ms. Briasco-Stewart, “any proposed amendment would be futile” and the Complaint should be dismissed with prejudice. See Reddy v. Litton Indus., Inc., 912 F.2d 291, 296 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court should put an end to Plaintiff’s attempt to use the legal process in retaliation against, and as further harassment of, Defendants. And eggplant_emoji's opinion is that some girls talk too much, while others are just perfect :)